loading...
Published on November 10, 2016
Court of Appeal unanimously allow appeal in jurisdictional dispute involving the Bank of Portugal

Lord Justice Moore-Bick, Lord Justice Sales and Lady Justice Gloster unanimously agreed, in their judgement handed down on 4 November 2016, that the Portuguese bridge bank Novo Banco had the better of the argument that when the Claimants issued proceedings in the English Court, Novo Banco was not a party to the Oak Facility Agreement.

Accordingly, the appropriate forum in which to challenge the various decisions of The Bank of Portugal in relation to the Oak Facility Agreement is the Portuguese Administrative Court. The Court of Appeal ruling illustrates the Court’s reluctance to undermine the scheme of universal recognition of measures taken by home Member States when dealing with their failing financial institutions.

Click download PDF to view full article.

DOWNLOAD PDF

News
Apr 10, 2024
The big freeze: Unitel SA v Unitel International Holdings BV & Anor
Mr Justice Bright has provided a useful reminder as to the hurdles that need to be overcome to secure a...
Mar 6, 2024
English High Court hands down significant judgment regarding an online auction of a blockchain-based NFT
The High Court has handed down judgment in Amir Soleymani v Nifty Gateway LLC. The background In 2021, Mr Soleymani,...
Feb 6, 2024
Anna Brownrigg speaking at Thought Leaders 4 Disputes: Financial Institutions Litigation
Anna Brownrigg will be speaking alongside a panel on Analysing the Rise of ESG Risks in Financial Institutions Litigation at...
Jan 29, 2024
PACCAR and beyond; the litigation funding landscape going into 2024
2023 was something of a rollercoaster in the UK for litigation funders and their clients. Ever since the Supreme Court...